The core of Faust’s complaint centers on specific USDA programs that he claims disadvantage white farmers. He asserts that existing policies result in unfair treatment, citing instances where white farmers face higher fees and receive lower loan guarantees compared to their minority and female counterparts. These allegations directly question the equitable distribution of vital financial resources intended to support the agricultural community, particularly within the dairy sector.

Supported by the conservative Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, the lawsuit underscores a broader effort to challenge race-conscious policies within government agencies. Faust has publicly stated his hope that this legal action will compel the USDA to provide answers, ensure accountability, and ultimately eradicate racial discrimination from its federal programs. This reflects a deep desire among some farmers for transparent and universally applied aid criteria.

The specific instances of alleged discrimination include differential treatment in program fees and loan terms. For example, Faust points to administrative fees that he must pay, from which minority and female farmers are exempt. Furthermore, he highlights loan guarantee programs where white farmers receive a lower percentage of guaranteed value compared to women and racial minorities, creating a perceived disadvantage for a significant segment of the farming population.