The core argument being put forth by Indian policy analysts is that succumbing to such pressure would undermine the livelihood of millions of Indian farmers and the robustness of its agricultural economy. India’s large agricultural base, including its extensive dairy sector, provides employment and sustenance to a significant portion of its population. Opening up further to subsidized US farm products could create an uneven playing field, potentially leading to price collapses for Indian produce and rendering local dairy and other agricultural ventures uncompetitive. This would have profound socioeconomic consequences across rural India.

Furthermore, the potential for trade disputes extends beyond just raw agricultural commodities to processed food products, directly affecting Indian dairy manufacturers and other food processing MSMEs. These smaller enterprises often operate on thin margins and are highly vulnerable to surges in imports of cheaper, subsidized goods. Maintaining protective measures for these sectors is seen as crucial for preserving India’s food security, promoting rural development, and fostering a resilient domestic supply chain, which is particularly vital for the international dairy community observing global trade dynamics.

Experts are advocating for India to strategically leverage its position as a major global market and a significant agricultural producer. Rather than passively accepting demands, India should engage in assertive diplomacy, emphasizing the importance of protecting its domestic interests while seeking equitable trade arrangements. This proactive approach would involve highlighting the welfare of its vast farming community and the critical role MSMEs play in its economic fabric, ensuring that any trade negotiations consider the broader implications for agricultural sustainability.