Justice Sundaresh notably remarked, “A cow is a cow. True love for God lies in serving fellow creatures and not in getting into these issues.” This statement underscored the court’s stance against imposing specific breed-based restrictions on milk supply for religious practices. The verdict highlights a judicial perspective that prioritizes universal spiritual principles over nuanced interpretations of traditional sourcing, which could impact dairy farmers and milk processors dealing with various breeds.

The petitioner’s legal counsel had argued that the use of indigenous cow milk was a fundamental tradition, citing references from Agamshastras, ancient canonical texts, and even noting that the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams (TTD) itself had considered such a proposal. This reflects a segment of the agribusiness community advocating for the promotion of native cattle breeds and their products, driven by cultural and perceived qualitative differences in dairy produce.

However, Justice Sundaresh countered this argument by asserting that such classifications were “man-made” and not divine mandates. He further stated, “God is equal for all humans. He is kind and fair to other creatures as well. You cannot say God wants only milk from a local cow.” This judicial interpretation emphasizes inclusivity, potentially influencing future discussions on dairy product sourcing for religious or cultural purposes across India’s diverse dairy economics.