At the center of the controversy were objections raised regarding religious representations, which quickly broadened into claims involving dairy-related matters. Opposition members pressed for answers, alleging irregularities and demanding accountability, while treasury benches rejected the charges and criticized what they described as attempts to politicize administrative issues.

The confrontation intensified as members traded barbs, with repeated interruptions forcing adjournments. The episode underscored how sensitive socio-political debates in Andhra Pradesh can intersect with economic sectors such as dairy, an industry that plays a significant role in rural livelihoods and cooperative structures across the state.

Government representatives maintained that due process was being followed and dismissed the allegations as unfounded. They emphasized that administrative actions related to the dairy sector were in line with established procedures, seeking to reassure stakeholders amid the escalating rhetoric inside the Council.