Lokapriya highlights that India’s agricultural sector is predominantly comprised of small-scale farmers who simply cannot compete with the massive economies of scale and extensive government subsidies enjoyed by large U.S. agricultural businesses. Introducing highly subsidized U.S. farm products into the Indian market could, according to this analysis, lead to catastrophic consequences for the livelihoods of over 60% of India’s population who reside in rural areas and depend on agriculture for survival. This direct threat to rural livelihoods is a central concern.

Furthermore, a significant cultural and dietary factor complicates the integration of U.S. dairy products into the Indian market. Lokapriya points out that U.S. dairy items frequently contain animal fat, which directly conflicts with the dietary preferences of India’s largely vegetarian population. This incompatibility adds another layer of complexity to the trade discussions, making it not just an economic issue but also one of cultural sensitivity and consumer acceptance for the international dairy community.

The expert’s assessment frames the potential trade deal, particularly concerning sensitive agricultural sectors like dairy, as a risk of economic “hara-kiri” for India. The deliberate act of foregoing such an agreement is viewed as a strategic necessity to shield millions of vulnerable farmers from the severe economic disruption that an influx of cheap, subsidized foreign products would cause. This protectionist stance is rooted in a deep concern for domestic socio-economic stability.